Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730139›Full record

ReviewDigestive surgery2025

Organ-Sparing Approach after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Oesophageal Cancer.

Matteo Pittacolo, Oleksandr Khoma, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo PittacoloDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oleksandr KhomaDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd M LagardeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bianca MostertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, b.wijnhoven@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is the standard of care for oesophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Up to a third of patients will have a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. Given the significant morbidity associated with surgery, active surveillance is considered as a potential alternative for patients with clinical complete response post-nCRT. Summary: The preSANO and preSINO trials have validated a multimodal diagnostic strategy combining oesophagogastroduodenoscopy with bite-on-bite biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes, and PET-CT to detect residual disease. The SANO trial is assessing whether active surveillance leads to non-inferior overall survival compared to planned surgery. Early results of randomized studies support previous retrospective reports of comparable oncological outcomes, with improved quality of life in the surveillance group. Despite concerns of increased morbidity of postponed surgery upon recurrence, recent data indicate comparable surgical outcomes of delayed oesophagectomy. Ongoing trials, including SANO-2, CELEAC, and NEEDS, aim to rationalize surveillance protocols, while SANO-3 is investigating the role of adding immunotherapy in improving response durability. Key Messages: Active surveillance represents a promising alternative to surgery for oesophageal cancer patients achieving complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. While it can spare patients the morbidity of oesophagectomy and significantly improve quality of life, it requires accurate response assessment and structured follow-up. Future developments, including immunotherapy and non-invasive diagnostics, may further refine this approach and expand its safe applicability. </p>.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyOrgan Sparing TreatmentsWatchful WaitingChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantEsophagectomyHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyActive surveillanceClinical response evaluationNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyOesophageal cancerOrgan-sparing strategiesResidual disease detectionSANOWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID40730139
PMCPMC12503578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.