ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025
Auditory change detection in musically trained adolescents and young adults: An EEG-fMRI study.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Auditory change detection in musically trained adolescents and young adults: An EEG-fMRI study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musical training has been associated with enhanced auditory processing, including superior preattentive sound discrimination. However, the neural mechanisms underlying these enhancements remain unclear. This study used electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate auditory deviance detection in musically trained and untrained 16-20-year-old participants. They listened to a sequence of major chord standards interspersed with minor chord deviants while watching a movie without sound in two separate sessions, once during EEG recording and once during fMRI. As expected, musically trained participants exhibited larger mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a amplitudes, indicating enhanced neural discrimination and attentional engagement with harmonic deviations. Surprisingly, fMRI revealed that the Control group showed greater activity in Heschl's gyrus for deviant versus standard chords. This indicates that the enhanced EEG responses in the Music group were accompanied by reduced hemodynamic activity in primary auditory areas. These findings highlight the value of multimodal approaches in studying neural differences between musically trained and untrained individuals and suggest that electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures capture distinct aspects of these differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.