Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730057›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology review2025

Integrating maintaining theories for addiction and binge-eating pathology: A review of affective and reward-based theories.

Emily K Burr, Lauren M Schaefer, Robert D Dvorak, Stephen A Wonderlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Reward Processing in Binge Eating and Harmful Drinking: A Systematic Review.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily K BurrDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Orlando, FL 32816, United States of America. Electronic address: emily.burr@ucf.edu.
Lauren M SchaeferCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, 120 8th Street S., Fargo, ND 58122, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1301 N. Columbia Road, Grand Forks, ND 58202, United States of America.
Robert D DvorakDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Orlando, FL 32816, United States of America.
Stephen A WonderlichCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, 120 8th Street S., Fargo, ND 58122, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1301 N. Columbia Road, Grand Forks, ND 58202, United States of America.

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI DODD, DORIAN R · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Applying Harm Reduction to Binge Eating Disorder: An Investigation of Protective Behavioral Strategies Against Uncontrolled EatingF31MH135713 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI Emily K Burr · 2024 to 2026
$96k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH135713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binge eating disorder (BED) is characterized by recurrent binge eating episodes. Many factors have been analyzed in the maintenance of binge eating disorder, but current treatments still fall short of optimal success rates, with approximately half of individuals with BED relapsing following intervention. Perhaps partially due to the many shared vulnerabilities and high rates of comorbidity, interventions of BED have increasingly incorporated strategies utilized in substance use disorder treatment and indeed, there are many overlapping components in prevailing theories of BED and addiction. Despite interventions increasingly sharing mechanisms, there is lacking an in-depth review of conceptualization overlaps and differences. Although there are many reviews of models for BED and substance use disorders, none to-date compare and contrast the models of the most analyzed maintenance factors across both disorders: affect-based models and reward-based models. This narrative review, incorporating key and currently influential models that have been included in reviews with empirical support from the last 15 years, explores these models in-depth and provides critical analysis of where they differ and overlap to inform future interventions. Affect-based models largely evolved separably, however, most contemporary reward-based models of BED borrow concepts historically explored in addiction. Clinical implications, including refinement of treatment for individuals with BED or BED and concurrent problematic substance use are discussed.

Indexed as

AffectBehavior, AddictiveBinge-Eating DisorderModels, PsychologicalPsychological TheoryRewardSubstance-Related DisordersHumansAffectAffect modelsBinge eating disorderNarrative reviewRewardReward modelsSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID40730057
PMCPMC13016704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.