Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729690›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Examining the Dose-Response Effects of Mindfulness Meditation Interventions on Well-Being: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nicholas Bowles, Alexander Burger, Jonathan N Davies, Julie A Simpson, Julieta Galante, Simon Dennis, Benjamin Stone, Nicholas T Van Dam

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas BowlesMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-8032
Alexander BurgerMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-6664-4554
Jonathan N DaviesMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-126X
Julie A SimpsonMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-2013
Julieta GalanteMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4108-5341
Simon DennisMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-1187
Benjamin StoneMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-0091-0139
Nicholas T Van DamMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1131-0739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMindfulness meditation has demonstrated modest benefits for mental health and well-being, although the relationship between practice dose and outcomes is unclear. Meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials have shown mixed results so far, although such results may stem from methodological issues rather than reflecting the absence of an underlying effect. Research outside structured programs suggests that long-term practice time is linked to positive outcomes, but bias due to self-selection over time may explain these results.

objectiveThe proposed trial aims to test dose-response effects for an online mindfulness meditation course, examining outcomes and participant engagement across different practice doses. In this pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we hypothesize that larger doses of mindfulness training will yield significantly larger effects and different doses will be significantly associated with variation in participant engagement, with lower engagement evident for higher doses.

methodsAt least 688 healthy adults aged between 18 and 65 years will be randomized to join one of three 4-week online mindfulness courses with daily practices of varying lengths (ie, 10, 20, or 30 min) against a minimally active control condition (4 min). Psychological well-being will be measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale at the baseline, midintervention, and postintervention time points and at 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are psychological distress, anxiety, depression, social anxiety, nonattachment, trait mindfulness, decentering, equanimity, repetitive negative thoughts, emotion regulation, attention control, and emotional reactivity. Other outcomes will be collected weekly and daily during the intervention period. The primary analysis will be undertaken following the intention-to-treat approach. We will also conduct per-protocol secondary analyses on all outcomes (ie, primary and secondary). In addition, we will systematically monitor for possible adverse experiences.

resultsThis study began screening and recruitment in May 2024. Recruitment was paused approximately 6 weeks later after a substantial number of participants were identified as being fraudulent and not meeting the eligibility criteria. Recruitment reopened in October 2024, and by the end of 2024, a total of 70 eligible participants were enrolled. Recruitment recommenced in early 2025 and will continue until the end of March 2025 or until the target sample is reached. We estimate that the results will be published by March 2026.

conclusionsThis study will contribute to the evidence base for mindfulness meditation and the question of how much practice people need to engage in to improve well-being and other psychological outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/72786.

Indexed as

MeditationMental HealthMindfulnessAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adultdose-responseinternet- and mobile-based interventionsmeditationmindfulnesswell-being

Identifiers

PMID40729690
PMCPMC12344385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.