Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729687›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Top 10 Research Lessons Learned From a Digital Child-Rearing Program in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicase Study.

Haley M LaMonica, Victoria Loblay, Adam Poulsen, Gabrielle Hindmarsh, Mafruha Alam, Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Qaisar Khan, Yun J C Song, Jacob J Crouse, Chloe Wilson and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Haley M LaMonicaBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-5467
Victoria LoblayBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-9619
Adam PoulsenBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-3894
Gabrielle HindmarshBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-3328
Mafruha AlamBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-4220
Mahalakshmi EkambareshwarBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-7120
Qaisar KhanBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9689-1666
Yun J C SongBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-6305
Jacob J CrouseBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3805-2936
Chloe WilsonBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-423X
Madelaine Sweeney-NashBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-9155
Olivia IannelliBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-2900
Aila NaderbagiBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9558-1142
Iqthyer U ZahedBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8424-8684
Adam YoonBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9960-954X
Mujahid TorwaliFaculty of Arts and Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-8917
Jakelin TroyFaculty of Arts and Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-1150
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-9895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtensive literature highlights the effectiveness of parenting programs for early childhood and parental outcomes globally. Increasing evidence shows that digital parenting programs are as effective as those delivered in person and that digital delivery is acceptable to parents. However, parenting programs cannot be one-size-fits-all but rather need to be developed, adapted, and refined to account for the context, culture, attitudes, behaviors, and expectations of the intended target audience.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify the key research lessons learned from Minderoo Foundation's Thrive by Five International Program, a large-scale digital and nondigital child-rearing program, including how they relate to research and development (R&D) processes and sociocultural context. The "core elements" of R&D identified in the Medical Research Council's framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions served as a guide to synthesize the data from this 3-year (2021-2024) program.

methodsWe used a multicase study design to build a deep understanding of the program, including how it varied across and was influenced by diverse sociocultural and contextual factors across 10 low- and middle-income countries. Data analysis for each case occurred over 3 phases, including qualitative data analysis and reporting, data synthesis to inform the transfer of learnings to the program, and, finally, a secondary analysis relating to program theory, stakeholder engagement, and the refinement of the program as they related to, interacted with, and were influenced by context.

resultsThe analysis resulted in five themes: (1) the role and value of partnerships, including the importance of selecting partners with strong and broad networks; (2) building collaborative practice with partners, which identifies strategies to foster collaboration; (3) honing a target audience, which emphasizes the importance of identifying the end user at the start of R&D; (4) navigating the digital landscape, including the use of context-specific dissemination strategies; and (5) managing linguistic diversity and translation, including the value of embedding a translator on the project team. Learnings regarding context and cultural diversity were integrated throughout the results.

conclusionsDigital parenting programs must be appropriate for and accessible to the target audience, aligned with information and communications technology infrastructure and policies, and fill a need in the digital health marketplace. When this is not feasible, a multichannel approach to dissemination using digital and nondigital strategies is necessary. While likely to increase project complexity, cross-sectoral partnerships, including with government bodies, are likely to broaden the program's reach. To facilitate digital parenting projects, it is critical that sufficient time be allocated to build meaningful collaborative partnerships centered on respect, cultural understanding, and open communication and grounded by a shared vision.

Indexed as

Child RearingDeveloping CountriesParentingChildHumanschild developmentdigital technologyglobal healthlow- and middle-income countriesmobile appparenting programparticipatory researchprocess evaluationstakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID40729687
PMCPMC12344384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.