ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Optimizing First-Line Therapeutics in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights From Joint Modeling and Large-Scale Data Analysis.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing First-Line Therapeutics in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights From Joint Modeling and Large-Scale Data Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often intrinsically resistant to several first- and second-line therapeutics and can rapidly acquire further resistance after a patient begins treatment. Treatment outcomes are, therefore, significantly impacted by the optimization of scheduling. Previous preclinical research has suggested that scheduling bevacizumab sequentially with combination antiproliferatives could improve clinical outcomes. Mathematical modeling is a well-suited tool for investigating this proposed modification. To address this critical need, individual patient tumor data from 11 clinical trials in NSCLC have been collated and used to develop a semi-mechanistic model of NSCLC growth and response to the therapeutics represented in those trials. Precise estimates of clinical parameters fundamental to cancer modeling have been produced, such as the rate of acquired resistance to various pharmaceuticals, the relationship between drug concentration and cancer cell death, as well as the fine dynamics of vascular remodeling in response to bevacizumab. In a reserved portion of the dataset, this model predicted the efficacy of individual treatment time courses with an average difference between final prediction and observation of 59.7% after a single tumor measurement and 11.7% after three successive tumor measurements. A delay of 9.6 h between pemetrexed-cisplatin and bevacizumab administration is predicted to optimize the benefit of sequential administration. At this gap, approximately 93.5% of simulated patients benefited from a gap in administration compared with concomitant administration. Of those simulated patients, the mean improvement in tumor reduction was 20.7%. This suggests that scheduling a modest gap between the administration of bevacizumab and partner antiproliferatives could meaningfully improve patient outcomes in NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.