Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729669›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Media Reports and Knowledge of e-Cigarette or Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury Among Adolescents in California: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Jijiang Wang, John Ayers, Eric Leas, Anthony Gamst, Shu-Hong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jijiang WangHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-4161
John AyersQualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-8691
Eric LeasHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-0336
Anthony GamstDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-7649
Shu-Hong ZhuHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-3441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: e-Cigarette or vaping use-associated lung injury (EVALI), first reported in July 2019, caused over 2807 hospitalizations and 68 deaths by February 2020, when the outbreak subsided and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stopped updating the case number. Media coverage of EVALI was extensive but not always accurate concerning the cause, which turned out to be vitamin E acetate, a compound added to certain illicit cannabis vape products. Studies have documented a significant increase in the perceived risk of vaping among the US adult population. However, research on how the EVALI outbreak influenced adolescents' knowledge of the illness and their perception of the risk of vaping products is limited, especially those that used probability sampling of the adolescent population. Objective: This study examined knowledge of EVALI among adolescents and explored the impact of media messages on their perceptions of the condition. Methods: Archived news reports on EVALI from an online tobacco media analysis engine, Tobacco Watcher (July 2019-March 2020), and data from the California Student Tobacco Survey, a large statewide school-based survey of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders (September 2019-March 2020; N=157,499), were analyzed. Students' awareness of EVALI and perceptions of its cause were examined in relation to their sources of information about EVALI, and their perceived risk of vaping was analyzed by their awareness of EVALI. Results: Of 19,661 news reports on Tobacco Watcher that discussed EVALI, 55.9% mentioned cannabis. Among the 157,499 middle and high school students participating in the statewide survey in California, 75% had heard about EVALI. The awareness level was similarly high for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders (75.7%, 74.6%, and 74.8%, respectively). Their primary source of knowledge about EVALI was media (63.1%), followed by parents (16.6%), teachers (8.1%), friends (7.7%), and peers (4.6%). Most students, 55%, believed nicotine was the cause of EVALI, while only 11% thought it was related to cannabis in vapes. Students who had heard about EVALI were more likely to rate vaping every day as extremely harmful than those who had not heard about it (67.8% vs 50.9%; P<.001). Conclusions: Most adolescents were aware of EVALI and cited media as the main source of their knowledge. The effects of extensive news coverage of EVALI have reached students as young as 8th graders. Most of those who were aware of EVALI, however, incorrectly believed that nicotine in vapes was the cause of EVALI. The actual cause-vitamin E acetate found in certain cannabis vapes-appeared to have been overlooked or not effectively communicated, especially in early media reports. Media coverage of EVALI presents a case study of the critical but complicated role of modern media in communicating health information.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLung InjuryMass MediaVapingAdolescentCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesE-cigarette or vaping use-associated lung injury (EVALI)mediamiddle and high school studentsrisk perceptionssocial normstobaccovapingyouth

Identifiers

PMID40729669
PMCPMC12306916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.