Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729599›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

Understanding the Lived Experiences of the members of the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research through Collins' Matrix of Domination Framework.

Ariel Chasen, Nicole L Scheuermann, Teri Balser, Anastasia Chouvalova, Clark Coffman, Amanda Conner, Adriel Cruz, Alexander Eden, Robert M Erdmann, Dawn Foster-Hartnett and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ariel ChasenDepartment of STEM Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705.
Nicole L ScheuermannDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.
Teri BalserDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1G3.
Anastasia ChouvalovaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.
Clark CoffmanDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Amanda ConnerDepartment of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419.
Adriel CruzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sierra College, Rocklin, CA 95677.
Alexander EdenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199.
Robert M ErdmannCenter for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota Rochester, Rochester, MN 55904.
Dawn Foster-HartnettVeterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Benjamin GerstnerDepartment of Biology, Penn State Behrend, Erie, PA 16563.
Cathy IshikawaDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819.
Justine LiepkalnsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, CO 80521.
Kelsey J MetzgerCenter for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota Rochester, Rochester, MN 55904.
Miriam SeguraDepartment of Biology, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA 30597.
Beverly L Smith-KeilingDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School and College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Erika L WilliamsDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411.
Ashli M WrightCenter for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Natalia CaporaleDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional science societies stand at the intersection of science, education, and research, providing crucial professional development and career opportunities for scientists. Their structures and policies can either promote more equitable ideologies, practices and outcomes or deepen existing disparities within science. In recent years, many societies have implemented diversity statements and initiatives, but few studies have examined their actual impact on membership composition and the experiences of their minoritized members. Critical education scholars emphasize the importance of examining these experiences through frameworks that center their voices, acknowledge institutional racism, and address the power imbalances that exclude marginalized groups. This study uses the matrix of domination framework (Collins, 1990) and its four domains of power (structural, disciplinary, interpersonal, and cultural/hegemonic) to investigate the perceptions and experiences of inclusion/exclusion of the members of the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research (SABER). We identified factors that contribute to and detract from the society's equity goals by analyzing members' experiences at different systemic levels. By framing members' experiences through the lens of dimensions of power, we reveal relationships and structures that may have otherwise remained invisible, offering new insights into strategies that can better aid professional societies toward their equity goals.

Indexed as

BiologyDiversity, Equity, InclusionSocieties, ScientificDisability DiscriminationEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleRacial GroupsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40729599
PMCPMC12415595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.