Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729597›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

How Latiné STEM Students' Identities Shaped Community Engagement: A Case Study.

Irfanul Alam, Jeffrey T Olimpo, Lisa A Corwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irfanul AlamDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Jeffrey T OlimpoOffice of Educational Innovation and Assessment, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015.
Lisa A CorwinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National efforts to enhance postsecondary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education have continued to emphasize the integration of civic engagement within curricula. Achieving this goal requires that we understand how students' social identities impact their community involvement, particularly for minoritized groups such as Latiné students, that are growing within the United States. This case study explores how 15 STEM Latiné students perceived their identities to influence their community engagement within a scientifically civically engaged course-based undergraduate research experience at a research-intensive Hispanic-Serving Institution. Multiple lines of evidence, including surveys, interviews, social identity mapping, and photovoice were collected. Findings revealed that students' social, science, and place identities significantly shaped their experience of scientific community engagement, presenting both opportunities and challenges. Biculturalism, language proficiency, and shared socioeconomic experiences enhanced students' connections to their communities, promoting motivation, and meaningful engagement. Conversely, differing identities, language barriers, and perceived exclusion hindered participation, highlighting the complexities of belonging. We recommend that STEM instructors consider tenants of culturally responsive education when engaging Latiné students. By understanding the relationship between identity and scientific civic engagement, educators can prepare STEM Latiné students to apply their scientific skills in the service of their communities.

Indexed as

EngineeringHispanic or LatinoMathematicsScienceSocial IdentificationStudentsTechnologyFemaleHumansMaleWhite

Identifiers

PMID40729597
PMCPMC12415596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.