ArticlePloS one2025
Indigenous wood species classification using a multi-stage deep learning with grad-CAM explainability and an ensemble technique for Northern Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wood species recognition has recently emerged as a vital field in the realm of forestry and ecological conservation. Early studies in this domain have offered various methods for classifying distinct wood species found worldwide using data collected from a particular region. An image dataset has been developed for wood species classification of Bangladeshi forest. Our aim is to address the gaps by comparing and contrasting our developed sequential Convolutional Neural Network based BdWood model with several deep learning, ensemble technique, Machine learning classification models on specific wood species identification for Bangladeshi forests. Using our own dataset, comprising more than 7119 high-quality captured images representing seven types of wood species of Bangladesh. It is found that DenseNet121 is the clear winner in our thorough evaluation among seven pre-trained models. The highest accuracy of DenseNet121 is achecived 97.09%. In addition, our customized BdWood model, which is adapted to the desired outcome, produced results that are excellent. BdWood model achieves a training accuracy of 99.80%, validation accuracy of 97.93%, an F1-score of 97.94%, and an outstanding ROC-AUC of 99.85%, demonstrating its effectiveness in wood species classification. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad CAM) is used to interpret the model's predictions, providing insights into the features contributing to the classification decisions. Finally, to make our research practically applicable, we have also developed an Android application as a tangible outcome of this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.