ArticlePloS one2025
Sickness absence rates in NHS England staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from multivariate regression and time series modelling.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tool for Predicting Disability Pension Applications in the Finnish Public Sector: Sickness Absences as Early Indicators of Declining Work Ability.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- COVID-19-related sickness absence among 4,721 NHS staff in England and its relation with long COVID symptoms: findings from NHS CHECK.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic placed immense strain on healthcare systems worldwide, with NHS England facing substantial challenges in managing staff illness-related absences amid surging treatment demands. Understanding the impact of the pandemic on sickness absence rates among NHS England staff is crucial to developing effective workforce management strategies and ensuring the continued delivery of healthcare. In this study, we use publicly available data to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sickness absence rates among NHS England staff between June 2020 and 2022. We begin with a data analysis to indicate the temporal patterns of sickness absence in NHS England staff between January 2015 and September 2022 inclusive. We then develop multivariate linear regression models to estimate COVID-19-related sickness absences. Indicators of COVID-19 activity, such as positive tests, hospitalizations, and ONS incidence, were incorporated. Furthermore, we use Seasonal ARIMA time series models to analyse the impact of COVID-19 on mental health-related absence. Our analysis highlights increases in sickness absence rates which coincide with the arrival of COVID-19 in England, and continue to rise throughout the pandemic. High periods of COVID-19 activity strongly correlated with staff absence, and the main categories driving the dynamics were COVID-19-related or mental health absences. We demonstrate that sickness absences in these two categories can be estimated accurately using multivariate linear regression (F(2, 15) = 132.63, [Formula: see text], adj [Formula: see text] =93.9%) and Seasonal ARIMA time series models, respectively. Moreover, we show that additional indicators of COVID-19 activity (positive tests, hospitalisations, ONS incidence) contain helpful information about staff infection pathways. This study offers insights into the dynamics of healthcare staff absences during a pandemic, contributing to both practical workforce management and academic research. The findings highlight the need for tailored approaches to address both infectious disease-related and mental health-related absences in healthcare settings during future health crises and opens new avenues for research into healthcare system resilience during crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.