ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Transfer Learning for Heterocycle Retrosynthesis.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Organic Chemistry as a Catalyst for AI Innovation: Challenges, Methods, and Emerging Paradigms.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heterocycles are important scaffolds in medicinal chemistry that can be used to modulate the binding mode as well as the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs. The importance of heterocycles has been exemplified by the publication of numerous data sets containing heterocyclic rings and their properties. However, those data sets lack synthetic routes toward the published heterocycles. Consequently, novel and uncommon heterocycles are not easily synthetically accessible. While retrosynthetic prediction models could usually be used to assist synthetic chemists, their performance is poor for heterocycle formation reactions due to low data availability. In this work, we compare the use of four different transfer learning methods to overcome the low data availability problem and improve the performance of retrosynthesis prediction models for ring-breaking disconnections. The mixed fine-tuned model achieves top-1 accuracy of 36.5%, and, moreover, 62.1% of its predictions are chemically valid and ring-breaking. Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of the mixed fine-tuned model in drug discovery by recreating synthetic routes toward two drug-like targets published in 2023. Finally, we introduce a method for further fine-tuning the model as new reaction data becomes available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.