Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729347›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

In vitro organ culture protocol for intact urogenital systems supporting gonadal differentiation.

Sarah L Whiteley, Clare E Holleley, Arthur Georges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah L WhiteleyInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-4366
Clare E HolleleyAustralian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.
Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing in vitro protocols for non-model species poses challenges, and yet are essential for advancing molecular biology studies. This is particularly true for sex determination research that relies on being able to functionally demonstrate the role of genes in determining sex and guiding the process of sex differentiation. Reptile species are attractive models for sex determination research as many species display thermolabile sex systems, allowing for exploration of gene-environment interactions. The first in vitro gonad culture technique for a turtle was published almost 35 years ago in 1990, but these techniques have seen limited use. This is likely because of challenges inherent to the system, where cultures need to be maintained for prolonged periods for gonadal differentiation to occur. All published techniques for long-term cultures involve removing the gonad from the surrounding mesonephros, which causes issues for proper testes development. Here we present the first protocol developed in the reptile model, Pogona vitticeps, that allows the long-term culture of the whole urogenital system supporting differentiation from biopotential gonads to ovaries or testes. Gross morphology is well maintained, and the gonad can be dissected from the mesonephros even after a culture period of up to 19 days. The cultured gonads display sex specific gene expression and morphology. This protocol will facilitate research in sex determination by providing an effective and low-cost alternative to existing protocols and expand capacity for functional manipulation studies in non-model species.

Indexed as

GonadsSex DifferentiationUrogenital SystemAnimalsFemaleMaleOrgan Culture TechniquesOvarySex Determination ProcessesTestisTurtles

Identifiers

PMID40729347
PMCPMC12306756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.