Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Guiding principles for accelerating change through health inequities research and practice: A modified Delphi consensus process.

Farah Ahmed, Charlotte Woodhead, Ali Hossaini, Nathan Stanley, Lucy Ensum, Rebecca Rhead, Juliana Onwumere, Ghazala Mir, Jacqueline Dyer, Stephani L Hatch

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Farah AhmedDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte WoodheadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ali HossainiDepartment of Engineering, Faculty of Natural, Mathematical & Engineering Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-222X
Nathan StanleyDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy EnsumDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca RheadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-604X
Juliana OnwumereDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ghazala MirLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline DyerBlack Thrive Global, London, United Kingdom.
Stephani L HatchDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9103-2427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a preponderance of evidence and considerable resources, health and social inequities persist, and in many cases, are widening. These inequities are not simply the result of passive structural and economic conditions but are actively maintained through institutional processes, norms, and ideologies that uphold the status quo. Reform within health inequities research, policy, and health and social care practice is therefore critical to disrupting these entrenched systems and catalysing both bottom-up and top-down change. We aimed to develop agreement for an iterative set of guiding principles underpinning ways of working for a newly formed Health and Social Equity Collective comprising researchers, community leaders, policymakers, and health and care professionals, seeking to address inequity by identifying and engaging the levers of change within and across institutions. The principles aim to inform a more inclusive and translational knowledge base through research practices, tackling entrenched inequalities in education, training, and capacity-building; and centring communities affected by health inequities through engagement and advocacy. We carried out a modified Delphi consensus process between March and September 2022 with Collective members and networks through online workshops and surveys. Out of 24 consensus statements developed and refined over a workshop and three successive survey rounds, we identified eleven key principles agreed upon by a majority of respondents. Two of these were rated high priority by over 75% of respondents, four by over 60% and five by over 50%. These could be grouped into three main topics detailing ways of working and change needed within: 'Knowledge and framing of health and social inequities, and incorporation into practice', 'Community engagement, involvement and peer research', and 'Organisational culture change', respectively. Given the pressing need to address inequities, these principles offer a grounding for future consensus building initiatives which also incorporate a wider diversity of perspectives, and which should be iteratively updated with ongoing learning from health equity initiatives nationally and internationally.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesDelphi TechniqueHealth EquityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40729344
PMCPMC12306778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.