ArticleReports (MDPI)2024
Significant Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum and Extensive Subcutaneous Emphysema in a COVID-19 Patient.
Article in Reports (MDPI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 64-year-old man, who had no pre-existing health conditions, was admitted to the intensive care unit due to progressive shortness of breath resulting from COVID-19. Initially, the patient responded to non-invasive mechanical ventilation, which improved his breathing function. However, after six days, his respiratory function worsened significantly, requiring invasive ventilation. Out of nowhere, the person experienced spontaneous pneumomediastinum and extensive subcutaneous emphysema. The next day, a spontaneous pneumothorax occurred and was successfully drained later. It became evident that there was extensive subcutaneous emphysema also. The CT scan of the chest confirmed the presence of spontaneous pneumomediastinum, but it did not have any effect on the patient's hemodynamics. The physicians performed a bronchoscopy and imaging with a contrast medium, which ruled out any lesions to the trachea or esophagus. No other issues related to the problem were identified during the examination. Unfortunately, microscopic bullae of interstitial emphysema, or micro air leaks, are visible when they are an adequate size on computed tomography. Recent literature and studies not available during the case report have shown that if the Macklin effect is detected on the baseline CT scan, it could predict the occurrence of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.