Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728918›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025

Pollen diet, more than geographic distance, shapes provision microbiome composition in two species of cavity-nesting bees.

Rachel L Vannette, Neal M Williams, Stephen S Peterson, Alexia N Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel L VannetteDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-3468
Neal M WilliamsDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3053-8445
Stephen S PetersonFoothill Bee Ranch, Foresthill, CA 95631, United States.
Alexia N MartinDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-3879

Funding

National Science Foundation 1929516USDA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial composition of stored food can influence its stability and the microbial species consumed by the organism feeding on it. Many bee species store nectar and pollen in provisions constructed to feed developing offspring. Yet, whether microbial composition is determined by the pollen types within provisions, variation between bee species at the same nesting sites, or geographic distance was unclear. Here, we sampled two species of cooccurring cavity nesting bees in the genus Osmia at 13 sites in California and examined the composition of pollen, fungi, and bacteria in provisions. Pollen composition explained 15% of variation in bacterial composition and ∼30% of variation in fungal composition, whereas spatial distance among sites explained minimal additional variation. Symbiotic microbe genera Ascosphaera, Sodalis, and Wolbachia showed contrasting patterns of association with pollen composition, suggesting distinct acquisition and transmission routes for each. Comparing provisions from both bee species comprised of the same pollens points to environmental acquisition rather than bee species as a key factor shaping the early stages of the bee microbiome in Osmia. The patterns we observed also contrast with Apilactobacillus-dominated provision microbiome in other solitary bee species, suggesting variable mechanisms of microbial assembly in stored food among bee species.

Indexed as

DietMicrobiotaPollenAnimalsBacteriaBeesCaliforniaFungiSymbiosisfood microbiomehost–microbe interactionsintraspecific variationOsmiasolitary bee

Identifiers

PMID40728918
PMCPMC12320775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.