Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728854›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025

Strengthening antimicrobial resistance diagnostics in National Reference Laboratories across One Health in South and Southeast Asia: impact of external quality assessment and targeted follow-up.

Freshwork Ayalew Abegaz, Hiba Al-Mir, Tomislav Kostyanev, Kristi Prifti, Soo-Young Kwon, Tobin Guarnacci, Lone Brink Rasmussen, Mohammad Julhas Sujan, Patrícia Teixeira Dos Santos, Rangsiya Prathan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Freshwork Ayalew AbegazEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Hiba Al-MirNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Tomislav KostyanevDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark-South-West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Kristi PriftiEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Soo-Young KwonEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Tobin GuarnacciEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Lone Brink RasmussenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Mohammad Julhas SujanEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-1219
Patrícia Teixeira Dos SantosNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Rangsiya PrathanResearch Unit for Microbial Food Safety and Antimicrobial Resistance, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Taradon LuangtongkumResearch Unit for Microbial Food Safety and Antimicrobial Resistance, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattrarat ChanchaitongResearch Unit for Microbial Food Safety and Antimicrobial Resistance, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8979-2440
Pitak SantanirandDepartment of Medical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Watcharaporn KamjumphoDepartment of Medical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ondari D MogeniEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Marianne HolmEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
Florian MarksEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-7170
Rungtip ChuanchuenResearch Unit for Microbial Food Safety and Antimicrobial Resistance, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9714-9199
Rene S HendriksenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Nimesh PoudyalEPIC, International Vaccine Institute, 1 SNU Research Park, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-7017

Funding

Department of Health and Social CareDepartment of Health and Social Care (DHSC)'s Fleming FundFleming Fund Regional FF64-474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe intent of this study was to evaluate and improve microbiology laboratory diagnostic capacity in selected National AMR Reference laboratories from South and Southeast Asia for AMR testing utilizing EQA and targeted follow-up support.

methodsA baseline assessment was conducted to evaluate quality management system (QMS) practices for laboratories participating in the Strengthening External Quality Assessment in Asia (EQASIA-EQA) programme for the first time. Following each EQA iteration, laboratory assessments were conducted, and underperforming laboratories received online consultations to identify root causes of deviations and implement corrective and preventive actions (CAPA). Laboratories with persistent underperformance, onsite visits and targeted training sessions were provided to support quality improvement.

resultsSignificant gaps were identified in the QMS of the 24 laboratories surveyed, with 38% lacking a QMS and 42% not conducting internal audits. Many laboratories lacked standard operating procedures (SOPs) for key processes, CAPA and equipment maintenance. Training and competency assessments were insufficient, with 50% of laboratories not conducting competency assessments. Additionally, 46% did not perform root cause analysis for EQA deviations, and 42% lacked a structured quality control programme. Water purity testing and equipment maintenance were also inadequate. Of the four baseline-assessed laboratories, three underperformed twice, and one underperformed three times across EQA iterations. Key deficiencies included the absence of a QMS and SOPs, as well as inadequate staff training and internal quality control. After targeted follow-up support, improvements were observed in QMS implementation, SOP development, staff training and quality control.

conclusionsParticipation in EQA, combined with targeted follow-up support, enhances laboratory quality and performance. These improvements ultimately contribute to the provision of reliable data that can guide policy actions to combat AMR.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialLaboratoriesLaboratories, ClinicalQuality Assurance, Health CareAsia, SoutheasternHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingQuality ControlQuality ImprovementAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40728854
PMCPMC12404728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.