Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Hypertension and blood pressure changes with dolutegravir or comparator antiretroviral therapy in randomized trials through 96 weeks.
Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic impact of dolutegravir as second-line therapy: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Association between transitioning to a dolutegravir-based regimen and risk of incident hypertension in adults with HIV in West Africa: a multicentre target trial emulation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo date, there are limited published data from randomized trials evaluating the effects of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens, including dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), on blood pressure (BP) in people with HIV-1 (PWH).
objectivesThis analysis evaluated BP changes from baseline and incident hypertension among ART-naive PWH randomized to dolutegravir-based three-drug ART or alternative comparator ART (cART) across pooled Phase 2/3 studies.
methodsIn this post hoc analysis of Phase 2/3 SPRING-1, SPRING-2, SINGLE and FLAMINGO clinical trials, BP was assessed at baseline, Week (W) 48 and W96. In PWH without evidence of hypertension at baseline, incident hypertension was defined as a single systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg measured after a 5 min rest, a hypertension adverse event and/or antihypertensive medication use during follow-up. Baseline factors associated with incident hypertension at W96 were assessed through multivariate analyses. BP changes between dolutegravir and cART were also assessed.
resultsAmong 2345 randomized participants, 1815 (77%) had no evidence of hypertension at baseline; 927 received dolutegravir-based ART and 888 received cART. Through W96, incident hypertension did not differ between groups [dolutegravir, 23% (n = 180/779); cART, 21% (n = 139/665); adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79-1.33]; ∼1% of participants initiated antihypertensive medication through W96 (dolutegravir, n = 3; cART, n = 1). At W96, no significant BP changes from baseline were observed (systolic BP, P = 0.741; diastolic BP, P = 0.683).
conclusionsRelative to non-dolutegravir-containing cART, dolutegravir-containing three-drug ART did not show any impact on incident hypertension in ART-naive PWH without evidence of hypertension at baseline through W96.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.