ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
The Spinal Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (spCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in spinal chordoma patients.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChordomas present most frequently in the lumbosacral spine. Spinal chordomas and treatment sequelae significantly affect quality of life (QOL) due to proximity of major neurovascular structures and the aggressive management required. However, since there are no validated instruments for this population, we aimed to develop a novel QOL metric for spinal chordoma patients.
methodsQualitative analysis of interview transcripts from 27 chordoma patients identified common symptoms categorized into 7 themes. Seventy-nine items from existing instruments addressing these themes formed an initial questionnaire distributed to 26 different spinal chordoma patients and 11 providers. Respondents rated items' relevance on a 5-point Likert scale. An average rating above 3.0 met the relevance threshold. Scores were compared between patients and providers, and mobile spine and sacrum lesions using two-sided Mann-Whitney U-tests (significance level: 0.05).
resultsForty-seven items surpassed the threshold. We removed redundant items to create the 35-item Spinal Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (spCPROS). These items were categorized in 8 patient-facing domains: general(3), mood(7), daily activities(6), pain(4), sleep(4), sensory and motor(9), and social activities(2). The categories with the most items with significant patient-provider discrepancies included mood(42%), sensory and motor(44%), pain(50%), and social activities(50%). Four items, including bladder control (3.53 vs. 1.90, p = 0.03) and bowel incontinence (4.07 vs. 1.70, p < 0.01), were more relevant to sacral lesions than mobile spine lesions.
conclusionWe developed a patient-centered tool for measuring QOL specific to spinal chordomas. Utilizing the spCPROS in preoperative and postoperative clinical encounters may allow clinicians to effectively assess symptom burden and provide guidance for high-quality patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.