ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Hyperparameter-controlled regularized reconstruction method based on object structure and acquisition conditions in SPECT.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of open-source BSREM reconstruction forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn clinical nuclear medicine, reconstruction methods incorporating regularization terms have been widely investigated. However, searching for optimal hyperparameters for the entire examination is time-consuming and arduous because the optimal hyperparameters need to be determined experimentally and vary depending on factors, including the acquisition condition, reconstruction condition, and so on. In this study, we propose a row-action type automatic regularized expectation maximization method (RAREM). This method considers the acquisition conditions and object structure for determining the hyperparameters and does not require the user to set the hyperparameters experimentally. This study was conducted using numerical simulations and a real SPECT system
methodsTotal variation-expectation maximization (TV-EM) and modified-block sequential regularized EM (BSREM) were compared with RAREM, with the optimal hyperparameters of the two conventional reconstruction methods determined in advance from normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) results. This simulation examination utilized three types of phantoms with the number of counts and projections being examined in six ways each, resulting in a total of 108 conditions. The NRMSE and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) were used to evaluate of the simulation examination, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. In the real examination, two types of phantoms were used, and the number of projections was examined in three ways, for a total of six conditions. Contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and specific binding ratio (SBR) were used to evaluate the real examination
resultsThe NRMSE, CRC, and SBR of RAREM were equivalent to those of the conventional methods, and the SSIM of RAREM was equivalent to or better than that of the conventional methods, with significant differences in some cases. The results indicated that RAREM worked well with the evaluated object structure and considered the acquisition conditions
conclusionIn this study, an automatically controlled regularization reconstruction method was proposed. The proposed method does not require the user to set hyperparameters experimentally and can avoid the investigation of optimal hyperparameters; it is an alternative to conventional regularized methods in clinical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.