Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728756›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2025

Hyperparameter-controlled regularized reconstruction method based on object structure and acquisition conditions in SPECT.

Tomoya Minagawa, Kensuke Hori, Takeyuki Hashimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of open-source BSREM reconstruction forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomoya MinagawaDepartment of Radiology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-22-36 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan. tomoya.minagawa@med.toho-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-5278
Kensuke HoriDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, 3-2-12 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Takeyuki HashimotoDepartment of Medical Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kyorin University, 5-4-1 Shimorenjaku, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-8612, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical nuclear medicine, reconstruction methods incorporating regularization terms have been widely investigated. However, searching for optimal hyperparameters for the entire examination is time-consuming and arduous because the optimal hyperparameters need to be determined experimentally and vary depending on factors, including the acquisition condition, reconstruction condition, and so on. In this study, we propose a row-action type automatic regularized expectation maximization method (RAREM). This method considers the acquisition conditions and object structure for determining the hyperparameters and does not require the user to set the hyperparameters experimentally. This study was conducted using numerical simulations and a real SPECT system

methodsTotal variation-expectation maximization (TV-EM) and modified-block sequential regularized EM (BSREM) were compared with RAREM, with the optimal hyperparameters of the two conventional reconstruction methods determined in advance from normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) results. This simulation examination utilized three types of phantoms with the number of counts and projections being examined in six ways each, resulting in a total of 108 conditions. The NRMSE and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) were used to evaluate of the simulation examination, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. In the real examination, two types of phantoms were used, and the number of projections was examined in three ways, for a total of six conditions. Contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) and specific binding ratio (SBR) were used to evaluate the real examination

resultsThe NRMSE, CRC, and SBR of RAREM were equivalent to those of the conventional methods, and the SSIM of RAREM was equivalent to or better than that of the conventional methods, with significant differences in some cases. The results indicated that RAREM worked well with the evaluated object structure and considered the acquisition conditions

conclusionIn this study, an automatically controlled regularization reconstruction method was proposed. The proposed method does not require the user to set hyperparameters experimentally and can avoid the investigation of optimal hyperparameters; it is an alternative to conventional regularized methods in clinical.

Indexed as

Automatic controlled hyperparametersRegularized reconstruction methodSPECT

Identifiers

PMID40728756
PMCPMC12307274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.