ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025
[Psychosocial crisis services-A special case of transsectoral healthcare].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Service users' perspectives on acute, outreach and outpatient psychiatric crisis interventions with and without peer support: results of a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe psychosocial burden of the population is increasing and psychosocial crisis intervention teams already play an important supportive role in the care in some regions in Germany. A comprehensive description of existing psychosocial crisis services in Germany is lacking.
objectiveDescription of the experiences of selected psychosocial crisis services in Germany and development of a concept for the implementation of new psychosocial crisis services. MATERIAL AND
methodsA narrative synthesis of the experiences of established psychosocial crisis intervention services in Germany was carried out based on searches in the scientific literature, perusal of information available on the internet regarding the activities of existing services and conversations with their representatives. We developed an experience-based concept for psychosocial crisis services in Germany.
resultsThe search for scientific evidence in the literature showed only limited evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial crisis intervention services. There is a broad diversity of types of services and models of financing. Barriers and facilitators of the implementation of psychosocial crisis services could be identified. These were included in a modular, experience-based transsectoral concept for psychosocial crisis intervention services in Germany.
conclusionAn experience-based modular concept for the implementation of a mental health crisis intervention service was developed. The modularity facilitates the adaptation to local and regional needs and resources and can promote a broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.