ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis-The new German S3 guideline].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modulation of Surgical Site Infection Risk in Spinal and Thoracic Surgeries Through Operative Parameters: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a relatively new movement in Germany that aims to rationalize the use of antibiotics. The primary aim is to halt the global rise of bacterial resistance which of course also affects Germany. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is an important topic for AMS. In December 2024 the new S3 guideline on perioperative prophylaxis was published by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), which are also presented here.Surgical site infections (SSI) have greatly increased in Germany in recent years. These should be prevented with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Nevertheless, for AMS reasons, the antibiotic prescription of perioperative prophylaxis should be judicious. As many studies have shown, the optimal time for administering antibiotics is 30-60 min before the surgical incision. This interval ensures an adequate antibiotic concentration in skin and subcutaneous tissue. A history of penicillin allergy should be preoperatively questioned as only a small proportion of patients who report a penicillin allergy actually have one; however, beta-lactams are the most important substances for perioperative prophylaxis, alternative substances such as clindamycin are less effective and resistance rates have greatly increased. Multidrug-resistant pathogens (MRE) are now given special consideration: the new guideline lists surgical procedures where MRE should be considered as well as the recommended screening and adjustment of substance selection in this situation. The most important point from the perspective of infectious diseases, however, is the duration of the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: it is specified also in the new guidelines (with a few exceptions) as a single dose (plus intraoperative re-dosing in the event of a long duration of surgery or high intraoperative blood loss).The new guidelines excellently summarize the existing data and based on these provide clear recommendations. It thus supports AMS efforts in this area in an exemplary manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.