ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
OF-score for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures- which parameter is decisive for the therapy decision? - a prospective multicentric cohort study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of the "modified Osteoporotic Fracture score" for treatment decision in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Optimized OF-Score- Therapy Prediction in Successfully Treated Patients With Osteoporotic Spine Fractures Using Minimal Clinically Important Difference.Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVarious treatment strategies for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) have been proposed, with the OF-score being a promising tool for therapeutic decision-making. The aim of this study is to determine the significance of the individual components of the OF-score for the therapy recommendation. Furthermore, score modifications will be sought that lead to improved agreement between the score recommendation and clinically successful therapy.
methodsData from the prospective multicenter study "Clinical evaluation of the OF-score for therapy planning and treatment recommendation for osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine" (EOFTT) with 518 patients (128 male, 390 female), including 344 surgically and 174 conservatively treated, were used. Binary discriminant analysis and logistic regression models were applied to analyze the predictive power of OF-score variables for the treatment decision. ROC analysis determined the predictive value of VAS pain, with thresholds defined using the Youden index.
resultsA total of 508 patients were analyzed. Binary discriminant analysis showed an explanatory power of 79.7%, and logistic regression showed 80.4%. The most powerful variables were VAS pain (0.809), mobilization (-0.405), and OF classification (0.302). ROC analysis identified a VAS threshold of 5.5 for surgical treatment (AUC = 0.811, p < 0.001). A VAS threshold of ≥ 5 yielded the highest accuracy (71.5%), while thresholds ≥ 4 had the highest sensitivity (71.9%) and ≥ 6 the highest specificity (82.0%).
conclusionsA modified OF-score with a VAS pain threshold of ≥ 5 improves accuracy and balances specificity and sensitivity. Despite this adjustment, the OF-score's predictive power of 80% remains underutilized. Further research could enhance the clinical utility of the modified score and explore the potential of other variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.