Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728609›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

A Survey of Deep Learning Methods and Tools for Protein Binding Site Prediction.

Alina Rohulia, Yanli Wang, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alina RohuliaDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Yanli WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jianlin ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. chengji@missouri.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are essential to various cellular functions by interacting with various ligands, including peptides, small molecules, ions, and nucleic acids. Accurate prediction of protein binding sites is essential for understanding these interactions and their biological significance. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have greatly enhanced the accuracy of protein binding site prediction. This chapter provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art DL methods for predicting protein binding sites, offering a detailed guide for developing and implementing DL models. It compiles and evaluates methods from recent literature, presenting key details such as model types, input/output data, databases, and evaluation metrics. Additionally, the chapter discusses the data collection and preprocessing steps required for training DL models, highlighting the utility of databases like UniProt, Dockground, PDBbind, and so on. The application of prominent DL architectures, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), is explored, along with recent advancements in these approaches. By providing a thorough overview of these methods and resources, this chapter equips researchers with the tools to advance AI-driven protein binding site prediction.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinLigandsNeural Networks, ComputerProtein BindingSoftwareLigandsProteinsArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningGraph neutral networkProtein binding site prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.