Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2026
Treatment with Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase 2b Clinical Trial (STAT).
Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03818854 (A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Clinical Trial of Allogeneic Bone Marrow-derived Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Clinical Trial of Allogeneic Bone Marrow-derived Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (hMSCs) for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell infusion for frailty: a phase 2, single-centre, randomised, open-label controlled trial.EBioMedicine · 2026Trial
- Cellular immunotherapy for COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: Results of the CIRCA-19 phase 1 safety and phase 2 randomized controlled trials.Stem cell reports · 2026Trial
- Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of pyroptosis in sepsis‑induced acute lung injury (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Safety, feasibility, and exploratory biomarker findings of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in hospitalized severe COVID-19: a phase I/II randomized trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): epidemiology, etiology, molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- The gut-lung axis in ARDS: beyond microbial translocation.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- The safety and efficacy of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell for acute respiratory distress syndrome: an open-label and multicenter phase 1 clinical trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Pulmonary vascular dysfunction in ARDS Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- One syndrome, many diseases: toward precision pharmacotherapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Beyond immunomodulation: mechanisms and synergistic strategies of mesenchymal stem cells in promoting alveolar epithelial and endothelial repair in ARDS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Acute lung injury induced by traumatic hemorrhagic shock: pathogenesis, biomarkers and therapeutic perspectives.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePrior clinical trials established the safety but not the efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
objectivesTo compare the efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs versus placebo in ARDS.
methodsProspective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase 2b clinical trial of one dose of intravenous MSCs (10 × 106/kg predicted body weight) versus placebo in 120 ventilated patients with ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <250 mm Hg). The primary endpoint was change in oxygenation index during the 36 hours after baseline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsEnrollment began in January 2020. Because of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, ARDS developed from COVID-19 in the majority of subjects (101 of 120; 84%). There were no significant baseline differences in severity of illness between patients treated with MSCs and those who received placebo in the entire cohort of 120 patients or in the 101 patients with COVID-19 ARDS. There were no differences in the primary endpoint of change in oxygenation index from baseline during the 36 hours after study product administration for the entire cohort or the COVID-19 subgroup, nor were there significant differences in mortality at 14, 28, 60, or 180 days. Plasma protein biomarker and gene expression analyses identified subgroups of patients with differential treatment responses in terms of clinical outcomes.
conclusionsThis phase 2b clinical trial identified no physiologic or clinical benefit from a single dose of MSCs in patients with ARDS, including those with COVID-19 ARDS. In future trials, baseline plasma biological markers may help identify patients who are more likely to benefit from MSC therapy.Clinical trial registered with www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03818854).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.