ArticleMetabolic brain disease2025
Optimizing predictive biomarkers for alzheimer's disease: muscarinic M1 antagonist-induced synaptic signaling disruptions and bee venom intervention through cholinergic modulation and multiregression dose selection.
Article in Metabolic brain disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LC-MS-based metabolomics reveals the In Vivo effects of cognitive formula 1 in rats with Aβ-induced Alzheimer's disease.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and neurochemical imbalances. The present study aims to ensure the correct dosage of scopolamine (SC) for inducing AD using Quality by Design to optimize the predictive biomarker acetylcholine esterase. Further, neuroprotective effects will be assessed with variable doses of bee venom (BV) by analyzing its effect on cognitive function, neurochemical markers, and oxidative stress. The goal of this study is to improve models of AD and learn more about how BV can protect neurons in a dose-dependent way during treatment. Methods: The rats were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6): Control, SC -induced AD, SC + Memantine (1 mg/kg bwt p.o.), and three BV doses (5, 10, 15 µl/kg, i.p, every other day) to study dose-dependent effects combined with SC. Memantine and BV were given to the animals two months before they developed AD, which happened on its own 14 days after treatment. After four days of behavioral assessment using the Morris Water Maze to evaluate cognitive function, the animals were humanely sacrificed. Blood and brain samples were collected for the measurement of serum liver and kidney function markers, oxidative and nitrosative stress parameters, cellular energy metabolites, amino acid profiles, neurotransmitters, and inflammatory markers in brain tissue. Results and Conclusion: The most remarkable neuroprotective effect was found in the group treated with BV medium and high dose showed a plateau, beyond which no more improvement was shown. These findings point toward a promising therapeutic approach for BV in the cognitive decline of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.