ArticleMycorrhiza2025
Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities across six Picea species grown in common gardens.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Host plant identity is a primary determinant of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal diversity and community composition, but the effect of host identity within congeneric species and whether this effect varies with environmental changes remain unclear. In this study, we used ITS rRNA amplicon sequencing to assess the diversity and community composition of ECM fungi in the roots of six phylogenetically distinct spruce (Picea) species grown in three common gardens with varying environmental conditions. Our results showed that, although ECM fungal richness and Shannon diversity were similar among spruce species at each site, their ECM fungal community composition differed. The differences in ECM fungal community composition between paired spruce species were not significant at the wettest site, but were significant at two dry sites, with the main difference observed between P. asperata and other spruce species (p < 0.05). The Mantel test indicated a weak positive correlation between ECM fungal community composition differences and the phylogenetic distance among host species. Preferred spruce/ECM fungal species varied across the three sites, with the lowest preference ratio observed at the wettest site. Additionally, Sebacina, Trichophaea, and Wilcoxina were the dominant genera in spruce roots. These results highlight the significant role of host identity within congeneric species in ECM fungal community assembly in relatively dry environment, enhancing our understanding of how congeneric plants influence ECM fungal diversity and community composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.