SynthesisRadiology2025
Safety of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric brain tumours systematically reviewed.Pediatric radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Advanced MRI methods for children and young adults with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) to support future multi-center clinical trials.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Bubbles in the barely born-contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neonates: a single-center experience.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Gadolinium-based contrast agents in pediatric MRI: renal safety, risk mitigation, and emerging alternatives.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Use of Brain MRI in Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy: International Recommendations for Screening, Monitoring, and Research.Neurology · 2026Article
- Knowledge-Guided Framework for Synthesizing Contrast-Dependent Data from Multi-Sequence Non-Contrast MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pediatric safety concerns regarding gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) used in contrast-enhanced MRI examinations persist. Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of GBCAs in children and adolescents undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI examinations, focusing on GBCA-associated adverse drug reaction (ADR), nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), and gadolinium deposition in the brain. Materials and Methods MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched for articles published up to November 22, 2023. Articles reporting the incidence of GBCA-associated ADRs with information on GBCA type were meta-analytically pooled. The incidence of NSF was systematically reviewed. For gadolinium deposition in the brain, a linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the individual-level association between the dentate nucleus (DN)-to-pons signal intensity (SI) ratios and the number of GBCA administrations, including the interaction effect of GBCA configuration (linear vs macrocyclic). Results Thirty-two studies covering 112 760 examinations for GBCA-associated ADRs, eight studies covering 4895 patients for NSF, and six studies covering 787 examinations for brain gadolinium deposition were included. The acute GBCA-associated ADR rate was 0.25% for physiologic (95% CI: 0.11, 0.53) and 0.13% for allergic-like (95% CI: 0.08, 0.20) reactions. The delayed ADR rate was 0.04% (95% CI: 0.02, 0.07). No patients with NSF were reported (0 of 4895 patients). There was an interaction effect of GBCA category (macrocyclic or linear) on the association between DN-to-pons SI ratios and the number of GBCA administrations (regression coefficient of interaction term, 0.004; 95% CI: 0.002, 0.007;
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.