Trial reportJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
A Randomized Feasibility Study of Virtual and Face-to-Face Care Using a Novel Mobile Health Solution for Outpatient Pediatric Burns.
Trial report in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Burn injury in childhood is common, and patients often travel long distances to burn centers due to regionalization of care. To address these geographic disparities, we created a smartphone app, telemedicine optimized burn intervention (TOBI), to provide access to burn care in the outpatient setting. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability, trial methodology, and variability estimates for a larger efficacy study. Eligible pediatric burn patients were recruited in the emergency or clinic setting and randomly assigned to virtual outpatient care with TOBI or routine face-to-face (FTF) care in the clinic. Participation, study retention, compliance with prescribed burn care regimen, and clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and each visit. After approaching 85 families, 65 (78%) patient/caregiver dyads were randomized to TOBI (n = 32) or FTF care (n = 33). The average age was 7.8 (5.4) vs 5.5 (4.6) years with 2.4 (2.1) vs 2.2 (1.6) % TBSA partial thickness burns in the TOBI and FTF groups, respectively. Treatment adherence was similar (TOBI 85% vs FTF 77%, 95% CI [-9.4, 25.7]), as were burn care completion rates (TOBI 91% vs FTF 76%, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.3]). Telemedicine optimized burn intervention patients had less pain (0.3 vs 1.0, 95% CI [-1.3, -0.1]), fewer in-person clinic visits (1.1 vs 2.1, 95% CI [-1.2, -0.7]), and shorter travel time (2.3 vs 4.0 h, 95% CI [-3.5, -0.1]). Virtual outpatient care was well-received by pediatric burn patients and caregivers, with strong engagement. The study established clinical efficacy endpoints for a future large-scale study. Clinical Trial Registration ID: 005019144.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.