Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728237›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

Ensemble of Bayesian alphabets via constraint weight optimization strategy improves genomic prediction accuracy.

Prabina Kumar Meher, Upendra Kumar Pradhan, Mrinmoy Ray, Ajit Gupta, Rajender Parsad, Pushpendra Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prabina Kumar MeherDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-8785
Upendra Kumar PradhanDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.
Mrinmoy RayDivision of Forecasting and Agricultural Systems Modeling, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.
Ajit GuptaDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.
Rajender ParsadICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.
Pushpendra Kumar GuptaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut 250004, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a weight optimization-based ensemble framework aimed at improving genomic prediction accuracy. It incorporates 8 Bayesian models-BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, BayesBpi, BayesCpi, BayesR, BayesL, and BayesRR in the ensemble framework, where the weight assigned to each model was optimized using genetic algorithm method. The performance of the ensemble model, named EnBayes, was evaluated on 18 datasets from 4 crop species, showing improved prediction accuracy compared to individual Bayesian models. New objective functions were proposed to improve prediction accuracy in terms of both Pearson's correlation coefficient and mean square error. The accuracy of the ensemble model was found to be associated with the number of models considered in the framework, where a few more accurate models achieved similar accuracy as that of more number of less accurate models. Additionally, over-bias and under-bias models also influenced the biasness of the ensemble model's accuracy. The study also explored a meta-learning approach using Bayesian models as base learners and random forest, quantile regression forest, and ridge regression as meta-learners, with the EnBayes model outperforming this approach. While traditional genomic prediction models GBLUP and rrBLUP and machine learning models support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting were included in the ensemble framework in addition to Bayesian models, the ensemble model achieved higher accuracy as compared to the individual Bayesian, BLUP, and machine learning models. We believe that EnBayes would contribute significantly to ongoing efforts on improving genomic prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBayesian modelensemble modelgenetic algorithmgenomic predictionmeta-learning

Identifiers

PMID40728237
PMCPMC12405891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.