ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Interactions between registered dietitians and the food industry in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Food industry's interactions with nutrition professionals in Australia: a survey.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, relationships between nutrition professionals and the food industry have raised concerns over the risks they may pose to the profession's credibility and integrity. However, empirical research on the nature and frequency of these interactions, as well as how professionals manage them, is limited. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 167 Registered Dietitians (RDs) from Quebec, Canada, regarding (i) the nature and frequency of their interactions with the industry, (ii) their perceptions of existing risks and benefits of those interactions, (iii) the strategies they employed to manage these interactions, and (iv) their confidence levels in managing those interactions. RDs in Quebec have experienced, on average, 1.7 interactions per month with the industry over the past year (May 2022-May 2023). The three most frequently reported interactions were (i) receiving targeted communications from the industry, (ii) participating in continuing education provided by the industry, and (iii) receiving educational materials for professionals and consumers created by the industry. Overall, RDs acknowledged benefits associated with interacting with the industry (e.g. improving the food quality of products on the market) but also identified risks (e.g. compromising professional independence) and discussed strategies to mitigate these risks, including referring to their Code of Ethics (56.9%). In conclusion, RDs in Quebec engage with the food industry in various ways. Perceptions of risks and benefits related to these interactions vary considerably, highlighting the need for training and standardized strategies to minimize conflicts of interest and manage these interactions effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.