Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728054›Full record

ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2025

Open letter to the Medical Services Advisory Committee regarding TMS Item Number regulations.

Saxby Pridmore, Yvonne Turnier-Shea, Marzena Rybak, Gregory M Peterson

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saxby PridmoreDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9170-1798
Yvonne Turnier-SheaHobart TMS, Bellerive, TAS, Australia.
Marzena RybakHobart TMS, Bellerive, TAS, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo present the perspective of professionals working in the field of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) regarding the regulations which impact the availability of government subsidisation via Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule Item Number rebates to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who are seeking TMS treatment.ConclusionsWe argue that three regulations should be withdrawn: (1) that patients who received TMS prior to 1 November 2021 are ineligible for TMS rebates after 1 November 2021; (2) that every person is subject to a limit of 50 TMS treatments in a lifetime; and (3) that rebates are not available for maintenance TMS. We also conclude that consideration should be given to the provision of rebates for TMS treatments when it is delivered as a first-line treatment for MDD.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderNational Health ProgramsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdvisory CommitteesAustraliaHumansequitymajor depressive disorderTMStranscranial magnetic stimulationtreatment coststreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID40728054
PMCPMC12528787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.