Trial reportPediatric pulmonology2025
Dupilumab Plus Medium-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) Improves Outcomes Compared With Placebo Plus Continued High-Dose ICS in Children With Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Type 2 Asthma.
Trial report in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02948959 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children 6 to <12 Years of Age With Uncontrolled Persistent Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children 6 to <12 Years of Age With Uncontrolled Persistent Asthma
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of dupilumab therapy in children ≤6 years with uncontrolled persistent asthma: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Biologic therapies for severe pediatric asthma: efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided selection.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDupilumab improved clinical outcomes in children (aged 6-11 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma and type 2 inflammation (baseline blood eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥ 20 ppb) in the phase 3 VOYAGE study (NCT02948959). We evaluated dupilumab plus medium-dose ICS versus placebo plus continued high-dose ICS in children in VOYAGE.
methodsChildren were randomized to dupilumab 100/200 mg by body weight or placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Annualized severe exacerbation rates, change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV
resultsData from 184 children were analyzed (dupilumab plus medium-dose ICS, n = 134; placebo plus high-dose ICS, n = 50). At Week 52, dupilumab plus medium-dose ICS versus placebo plus high-dose ICS significantly reduced exacerbations by 74.3%, and significantly improved ppFEV
conclusionIn children with moderate-to-severe asthma and type 2 inflammation, treatment with dupilumab plus medium-dose ICS reduced exacerbations and improved lung function and asthma control compared with placebo plus continued high-dose ICS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.