Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727870›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Methods for Studying Bias in Graduate Medical Education.

Danielle L Terry, Jessica Graham, Christopher P Terry, Mayanthi Telge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle L TerryDepartment of Family Medicine, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA.
Jessica GrahamElmira College, Elmira, NY.
Christopher P TerryElmira College, Elmira, NY.
Mayanthi TelgeGuthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent with patterns seen in the larger population, bias in medical settings has been well established and negatively impacts outcomes, quality of care, and patient-clinician interactions. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief and introductory review of research methods for studying bias in graduate medical education, including (a) specific designs to consider and (b) considerations for overcoming barriers to implementation. While there are a variety of ways in which bias and inequity can be studied in medical settings, the unique limitations of graduate medical education may pose numerous challenges that researchers may need to overcome. Limited research addresses bias and inequity in graduate medical settings; future research might explore these topics in ways that are tailored to this educational setting.

Identifiers

PMID40727870
PMCPMC12303144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.