Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727859›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Association of Primary Payor Source and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Cynthia Nguyen, Jeffrey M Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia NguyenCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
Jeffrey M CurtisCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The association between health care payor source and HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) has been evaluated only in cross-section. FQHCs provide an opportunity to compare the association of glycemic control between populations with or without public or private insurance followed over time. Methods: In this observational study of primary care data, we compared HbA1c values by antecedent insurance status among adults with T2D, before and after adjustment for age, sex, and primary spoken language. Results: Among 9,848 patients evaluated, mean HbA1c differed ( Conclusion: In this study of FQHCs patient data, HbA1c measured after nearly 2 years of payor source observation differed by payor. Measured covariates did not fully explain the differences. Uninsured patients and those with Medicaid had worse HbA1c than those with Medicare or private insurance. These results may be used to inform another study with more available variables to determine what specific factors may mediate the association between payor source and HbA1c.

Identifiers

PMID40727859
PMCPMC12303141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.