A fast approach to estimating Windkessel model parameters for patient-specific multi-scale CFD simulations of aortic flow.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of physician-modified stent graft repair for distal residual stanford type B aortic dissection.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026
   Article
2. From Heart to Abdominal Aorta: Integrating Multi-Modal Cardiac Imaging Derived Haemodynamic Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Stratification, Surveillance, Pre-Operative Assessment and Therapeutic Decision-Making.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
3. Hemodynamic analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery reconstructed by chimney stent.Vascular · 2025
   Article
4. Modeling Techniques and Boundary Conditions in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Analysis: Latest Developments in Simulation and Integration of Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
5. Estimating flow division in aortic branches of diseased aorta: a method for boundary condition specification in CFD analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.