Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727666›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Advances in microfluidic mixers for time-resolved structural biology with X-rays.

Kara A Zielinski, Lois Pollack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biophysical reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kara A ZielinskiSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
Lois PollackSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.

Funding

Nucleic acid interactions with partners: ions and proteinsR35GM122514 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Lois Pollack · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural biology techniques that utilize X-rays have contributed in fundamental ways to our understanding of biological macromolecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids. In addition to static structures, recent advances now allow for the observation of molecular motions using X-rays, facilitated by the many technological developments in both sources and detectors. Leveraging these advances, new approaches have been demonstrated that capture structural dynamics, sometimes with very high spatial resolution. Among the most promising are time-resolved studies, which involve triggering a reaction and capturing snapshots of reaction progression at set time delays. This review focuses on one type of time-resolved experiments, mixing experiments, in which reactants are combined within microfluidic mixers to initiate a reaction. Microfluidic mixers are extremely versatile; different designs can be optimized for various reaction types and compatibility with different structural biology techniques. When compared to other time-resolved approaches, mixing experiments are suitable for the widest range of biological applications. This review provides an overview of the current state of the field, including a review of different mixer types, and offers practical considerations for designing and performing time-resolved mixing studies with various X-ray-based structural biology methods.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsMixingStructural biologyStructural dynamicsTime-resolved

Identifiers

PMID40727666
PMCPMC12290166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.