ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Comprehensive review of bacterial death mechanism on nanopillared nanostructured surfaces.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial surface engineering: bioinspiration from leaves to medical devices.RSC applied interfaces · 2026Review
- Advancements in Technologies Targeting Horizontal Gene TransferRoutes to Control Drug Resistance Evolution.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2026Review
- Review of Antimicrobial Properties of Carbon Nanomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance presents a significant global concern, worsened by overuse and limited development of new antibiotics. Medical implants, in particular, are increasingly susceptible to bacterial infections. To prevent biofilm formation on implants, it is essential to design specialized surface characteristics that either kill bacteria or inhibit their growth. Nanostructures resembling those found in nature, such as cicada wings, exhibit pronounced antibacterial efficacy. Drawing inspiration from these natural surfaces, artificial nanostructures made with similar features have demonstrated bactericidal effect. The bactericidal mechanism in nanostructures may seem simple, as the nanofeatures pierce through bacterial cells, leading to their death. However, research has shown that it is more complex and requires thorough investigation. Several studies indicate that while the bactericidal mechanism is initiated by mechanical contact, the precise killing process remains uncertain. Numerous experimental and theoretical investigations have aimed to elucidate the exact killing mechanism, yielding diverse conclusions and hypotheses, including cell death attributed to creep failure, motion-induced shear failure, apoptosis-induced programmed cell death and autolytic cell death, among others. This study undertakes a comprehensive review of all proposed death mechanisms. Moreover, it draws conclusions on the killing mechanism by meticulously analyzing the properties of bacterial membranes, their mechanosensing and adhesion mechanisms, energy-based models for bacterial adhesion, and experimental outcomes regarding the bactericidal efficacy of surfaces exhibiting diverse geometries. Graphical Abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.