ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Machine Learning-based Complementary Artificial Intelligence Model for Dermoscopic Diagnosis of Pigmented Skin Lesions in Resource-limited Settings.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid advancements in big data and machine learning have expanded their application in healthcare, introducing sophisticated diagnostics to settings with limited medical resources. Notably, free artificial intelligence (AI) services that require no programming skills are now accessible to healthcare professionals, allowing those in underresourced areas to leverage AI technology. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of these accessible services for diagnosing pigmented skin tumors, underscoring the democratization of advanced medical technologies. Methods: In this experimental diagnostic study, we collected 400 dermoscopic images (100 per tumor type) labeled through supervised learning from pathologically confirmed cases. The images were split into training, validation, and testing datasets (8:1:1 ratio) and uploaded to Vertex AI for model training. Supervised learning was performed using the Google Cloud Platform, Vertex AI, based on pathological diagnoses. The model's performance was assessed using confusion matrices and precision-recall curves. Results: The AI model achieved an average recall rate of 86.3%, precision rate of 87.3%, accuracy of 86.3%, and F1 score of 0.87. Misclassification rates were less than 20% for each category. Accuracy was 80% for malignant melanoma and 100% for both basal cell carcinoma and seborrheic keratosis. Testing on separate cases yielded an accuracy of approximately 70%. Conclusions: The metrics obtained in this study suggest that the model can reliably assist in the diagnostic process, even for practitioners without prior AI expertise. The study demonstrated that free AI tools can accurately classify pigmented skin lesions with minimal expertise, potentially providing high-precision diagnostic support in settings lacking dermatologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.