Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727605›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2025

Risk level prediction for problematic internet use: A digital health perspective.

Youngjung Suh, Jinwon Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Youngjung SuhDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Kongju National University, Republic of Korea.
Jinwon YooDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Kongju National University, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problematic Internet Usage (PIU) research has long been a topic of interest across disciplines, and numerous theoretical and empirical studies have been conducted over the past decade. This study systematically reviews the existing literature to identify key research objectives, datasets, methodologies, and applications, and to highlight important gaps and challenges. To improve understanding and detection of PIU, we designed a comprehensive machine learning pipeline that combines detailed preprocessing, feature extraction, modeling, and performance validation strategies. Systematic evaluations demonstrate that model performance is significantly improved by addressing missing values and data imbalance. In particular, we identified key predictive features such as physiological indicators, physical activity, sleep quality, and Internet usage patterns, and clearly elucidated the differences in the positive or negative impact of these key features on PIU detection at different severity levels. These results have practical implications, especially for promoting early detection and enabling tailored interventions. Ultimately, this study contributes to digital health initiatives by providing actionable insights for the development of effective Internet addiction prevention and intervention programs.

Indexed as

Deep learningMachine learningPredictive analysisProblematic internet use

Identifiers

PMID40727605
PMCPMC12301810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.