ArticleJOR spine2025
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Online Prognostic Model for Cervical Spondylosis Patients After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Multicenter Study.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A machine learning model for the early prediction of Gram-negative bloodstream infection in ICU patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical spondylosis (CS) is a degenerative condition often requiring surgical intervention, such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), to alleviate symptoms. However, postoperative outcomes can vary significantly. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for 1-year outcomes in CS patients after ACDF using multiple machine learning algorithms. Methods: Data from 973 patients across three clinical centers, including 872 patients in the retrospective cohort and 101 patients in the prospective cohort, were utilized. A variety of clinical and laboratory features were identified using LASSO regression. Various machine learning algorithms were employed to develop predictive models. The models' performance was assessed and compared using metrics such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretation and feature importance analysis were carried out using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. Finally, the model was deployed on the web by using the Shiny app. Results: The model was constructed using 10 essential predictors. Ten machine learning models were evaluated, with the stacking ensemble learning model demonstrating superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.81 in the internal validation set, 0.80 in the external validation set, and 0.82 in the prospective cohort). Furthermore, CRP, MONO, ESR, and age were highlighted as critical predictors. Conclusions: This predictive tool offers a robust framework for personalized postoperative management in CS patients, potentially improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.