Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Development and clinical application of an automated machine learning-based delirium risk prediction model for emergency polytrauma patients.

Zhenyi Liu, Yihao Huang, Long Li, Yisha Xu, Peng Wu, Zhigang Zhang, Tingyong Han, Liangjie Zhang, Ming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based model for predicting mortality risk in polytrauma patients].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhenyi LiuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The 945th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Yihao HuangDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, The 945th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Long LiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The 945th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Yisha XuEmergency Department, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Peng WuEmergency Department, Yucheng District People's Hospital of Ya'an, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Zhigang ZhangEmergency Department, Mingshan District People's Hospital of Ya'an, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Tingyong HanEmergency Department, Affiliated Hospital of Ya'an Polytechnic College, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Liangjie ZhangEmergency Department, Ya'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Ming ZhangDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The 945th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To address the limitations of conventional delirium prediction models in emergency polytrauma care, this study developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework incorporating trauma-specific biomarkers and advanced optimization algorithms for risk stratification of delirium in emergency polytrauma patients. Methods: This multi-center retrospective observational cohort study was conducted across six hospitals in the Ya'an region. A total of 956 polytrauma patients admitted between January 2020 and December 2024 were enrolled, complying with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) diagnostic criteria for polytrauma. Demographic, clinical (e.g., Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], Injury Severity Score [ISS]), and laboratory data (e.g., fibrin degradation products [FDP], lactate) were systematically collected. To address high-dimensional clinical heterogeneity, an Improved Flood Algorithm (IFLA)-enhanced with sine mapping initialization and Cauchy mutation perturbations-was integrated into an automated machine learning (AutoML) framework for simultaneous feature selection and hyperparameter optimization. Model performance was benchmarked against conventional algorithms (logistic regression [LR], support vector machine [SVM], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], LightGBM) using five-fold cross-validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework quantified predictor contributions, and a MATLAB-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) was implemented for real-time risk stratification. Results: The improved algorithm significantly outperformed other algorithms on 12 standard test functions. The automated machine learning (AutoML) model achieved ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of 0.9690 and 0.9611, respectively, on the training set, and 0.8929 and 0.8487, respectively, on the test set, both significantly higher than those of four other prediction models. The AutoML model identified 5 important features: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, lactate level, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), body mass index (BMI), and fibrin degradation products (FDP). The decision support system demonstrated clinical utility with net benefit across risk thresholds. Conclusion: This study provides a trauma-specific, interpretable ML tool that integrates GCS scoring and dynamic biomarker monitoring, enabling early delirium risk identification in emergency polytrauma. The framework demonstrates feasibility for integration into clinical workflows to improve trauma care quality.

Indexed as

deliriumexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningpolytraumapredictive model

Identifiers

PMID40727448
PMCPMC12301415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.