Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727413›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Does the risk-taking behaviour of a group influence individual risk-taking behaviour?

Asieh Daneshi, Marcel Brass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asieh DaneshiBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-4012
Marcel BrassBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-4019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People often take more risks when in groups than when alone, but studying group-based risk-taking can be logistically challenging. This study used an online simulation of the balloon analogue risk task featuring virtual agents to examine how the presence of others influences individual decision-making. Ninety-nine participants completed 160 trials of a balloon inflation task while situated in a virtual room with five computer-generated agents. On each trial, a varying number of agents also inflated balloons and displayed either risk-taking or risk-avoiding behaviour. Results showed that participants' risk-taking generally increased as more agents co-inflated, and this effect was stronger when the agents behaved riskily, consistent with the risky shift phenomenon. These findings demonstrate the utility of virtual simulations for exploring social influences on risk-related decisions.

Indexed as

conformitydecision-making in the grouprisk-taking behavioursocial contagion

Identifiers

PMID40727413
PMCPMC12303118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.