Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727408›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Can adults automatically process and translate between numerical representations?

Iro Xenidou-Dervou, Caroline Appleton, Serena Rossi, Natasha Guy, Camilla Gilmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iro Xenidou-DervouCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Department of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-6191
Caroline AppletonCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Department of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Serena RossiCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Department of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-5774
Natasha GuyCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Department of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Camilla GilmoreCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Department of Mathematics Education, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arithmetic and the ability to use numbers are important skills. Numbers can be represented in three ways: through number words, Arabic symbols or non-symbolically. Much research attention has focused on how associations form between these three numerical representations. However, it is not yet clear whether these associations are automatic or if they require working memory (WM) resources. In this registered report, we used the dual-task paradigm to answer this question. Eighty-one adults were administered dot, digit and cross-modal (i.e. dot versus digit) magnitude comparison tasks in standalone and dual-task conditions with phonological (PL) or visuospatial (VSSP) WM interference. We found that all three types of magnitude comparison necessitated WM resources. Symbolic comparison necessitated VSSP WM. Surprisingly, in this task, accuracy improved under both WM interference conditions, evidencing the proposal that introducing executive function challenges in simple and familiar tasks can improve performance. In non-symbolic comparison, our findings demonstrated that the VSSP and the PL-albeit to a lesser extent-were employed. Finally, cross-modal comparison necessitated VSSP WM. These findings evidence the fundamental role visuospatial processing plays in numerical processing and that adults require WM resources for simply processing numerical representations and translating between them.

Indexed as

cross-modal comparisondual-task paradigmnumerical cognitionnumerical representationsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID40727408
PMCPMC12303100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.