Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727405›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Morphological constraints in hymenopteran forewings limit flight efficiency optimization.

Iman Fadel, Pablo S Milla Carmona, Yuming Liu, Emily J Rayfield, Philip C J Donoghue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iman FadelSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4580-1150
Pablo S Milla CarmonaSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-6244
Yuming LiuSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-9607
Emily J RayfieldSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-750X
Philip C J DonoghueSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3116-7463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of wings and flapping flight was integral to the radiation of Pterygota, but little is known about the factors underpinning the morphological disparity of insect wings. We use a theoretical morphospace approach to investigate forewing morphology across the four major clades in Hymenoptera (sawflies, wasps, bees and ants). Using elliptical Fourier analysis we quantified the outline of 298 forewings and generated 494 theoretical forms plotted within a morphospace. Theoretical forewing shapes were analysed across three metrics for flight performance that are antagonistic and ranked subsequently according to their functional optimization. The results show theoretical wings with larger, rounder apical tips were most optimized for a trade-off between reducing induced drag and increasing both lift production and breakage resistance. Empirical forewings cluster in a suboptimal region of theoretical morphospace exhibiting moderate flight performance. Phylomorphospace analysis reveals high levels of convergence in wing shapes across Hymenoptera, with a weak but significant phylogenetic signal. Regression analyses found significant allometric covariation but no significant relationship with environmental measures (temperature and precipitation) on forewing morphology. These findings demonstrate that hymenopteran wing morphologies are not optimized for flight function. Instead, function and allometry act in concert to constrain the variation of hymenopteran forewing morphologies.

Indexed as

elliptical Fourier analysisfinite element analysisHymenopteramorphometricsoptimalityperformance landscapes

Identifiers

PMID40727405
PMCPMC12303117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.