ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Morphological constraints in hymenopteran forewings limit flight efficiency optimization.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hummingbird and Hawkmoth Wing Shape: Analyzing Functional Convergence in Analogous Structures.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Morphological constraints in hymenopteran forewings limit flight efficiency optimization.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of wings and flapping flight was integral to the radiation of Pterygota, but little is known about the factors underpinning the morphological disparity of insect wings. We use a theoretical morphospace approach to investigate forewing morphology across the four major clades in Hymenoptera (sawflies, wasps, bees and ants). Using elliptical Fourier analysis we quantified the outline of 298 forewings and generated 494 theoretical forms plotted within a morphospace. Theoretical forewing shapes were analysed across three metrics for flight performance that are antagonistic and ranked subsequently according to their functional optimization. The results show theoretical wings with larger, rounder apical tips were most optimized for a trade-off between reducing induced drag and increasing both lift production and breakage resistance. Empirical forewings cluster in a suboptimal region of theoretical morphospace exhibiting moderate flight performance. Phylomorphospace analysis reveals high levels of convergence in wing shapes across Hymenoptera, with a weak but significant phylogenetic signal. Regression analyses found significant allometric covariation but no significant relationship with environmental measures (temperature and precipitation) on forewing morphology. These findings demonstrate that hymenopteran wing morphologies are not optimized for flight function. Instead, function and allometry act in concert to constrain the variation of hymenopteran forewing morphologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.