Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727397›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Revisiting Volterra defects: geometrical relation between edge dislocations and wedge disclinations.

Shunsuke Kobayashi, Katsumi Takemasa, Ryuichi Tarumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shunsuke KobayashiGraduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-6798
Katsumi TakemasaGraduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Ryuichi TarumiGraduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2405-967X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive mathematical model for Volterra defects and explores their relations using differential geometry on Riemann-Cartan manifolds. Following the standard Volterra process, we derived the Cartan moving frame, a geometric representation of plastic fields, and the associated Riemannian metric using exterior algebra. Although the analysis naturally defines the geometry of three types of dislocations and the wedge disclination, it fails to classify twist disclinations owing to the persistent torsion component, suggesting the need for modifications to the Volterra process. By leveraging the interchangeability of the Weitzenböck and Levi-Civita connections and applying an analytical solution for plasticity derived from the Biot-Savart law, we provide a rigorous mathematical proof of the long-standing phenomenological relationship between edge dislocations and wedge disclinations. Additionally, we showcase the effectiveness of novel mathematical tools, including Riemannian holonomy for analysing the Frank vector and complex potentials that encapsulate the topological properties of wedge disclinations as jump discontinuities. Furthermore, we derive analytical expressions for the linearized stress fields of wedge disclinations and confirm their consistency with existing results. These findings demonstrate that the present geometrical framework extends and generalizes the classical theory of Volterra defects.

Indexed as

Cartan structure equationsdifferential geometrydislocation and disclinationRiemann–Cartan manifoldWeitzenböck and Levi-Civita connections

Identifiers

PMID40727397
PMCPMC12303116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.