Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727372›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Predicting pathogenic DNA damage repair gene mutations in prostate cancer patients: a multi-center magnetic resonance imaging radiomics study.

Yuntian Chen, Jinge Zhao, Lei Ye, Diwei Zhao, Sha Zhu, Bangwei Fang, Fengnian Zhao, Ling Yang, Zhenhua Liu, Jindong Dai and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Yuntian Chen *Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-312X
Jinge Zhao *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lei Ye *Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-1490
Diwei Zhao *Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Sha ZhuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bangwei FangDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fengnian ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling YangDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhenhua LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jindong DaiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Nanwei XuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yanfeng TangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Haolin LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhipeng WangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiang TuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fangjian ZhouDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dingwei YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Bin SongDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yonghong LiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yao ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Pengfei ShenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao ZengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jin YaoDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5414-6427
Guangxi SunDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genetic testing for pathogenic DNA damage repair gene (pDDRg) mutations has clinical benefits for prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but its real-world application faces challenges due to its high associated costs. We sought to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model capable of assessing the likelihood of PCa patients harboring pDDRg mutations. We then rigorously validated its predictive value in two external validation cohorts. Methods: A total of 225 patients with both multiparametric MRI data before prostate biopsy and genetic testing information for pDDRg mutations were included in this study. The radiomics features were extracted from the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences of the MRI images in the training cohort (N=101) using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to validate the predictive value of the model in both the internal (N=41) and external (N=83) validation cohorts. Results: In total, 48 of the 225 (21.3%) patients in our cohort were identified by genetic testing as having positive pDDRg mutations, including Conclusions: Our MRI radiomics-based predictive model is a promising pre-testing tool for pDDRg mutation prediction in patients with PCa. Prospective studies need to be conducted to further validate the power of this predictive model before its clinical application.

Indexed as

DNA damage repair genes (DDRgs)Prostate cancer (PCa)radiomicsrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40727372
PMCPMC12290751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.