Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727319›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025

Tears, Tendons, and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research.

Tristan Hoon, Rishank Chillakuru, Latha Ganti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tristan HoonOrlando Science High School.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3671-2181
Rishank ChillakuruCase Western Reserve University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2626-4827
Latha GantiWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis investigates global research trends in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention and treatment by evaluating 4,086 articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1985 to June 18, 2025. The top funding agencies of ACL research showed governmental-linked institutions from the United States, the People's Republic of China, and Japan supporting a substantial part of ACL literature. Keyword emphasis on surgical methods was evident in the indexed literature on ACL. Continued research towards improving surgical methods will prevent retear, assist in more efficient recovery, and better long-term outcomes for the patient.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)bibliometric analysis

Identifiers

PMID40727319
PMCPMC12301095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.