Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727303›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025

Multidimensional advances in neural interface technology for peripheral nerve repair: From material innovation to clinical translation.

Jianchao Wu, Qixin Han, Dingkun Gui, Yun Qian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianchao WuNational Center for Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qixin HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Dingkun GuiDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yun QianNational Center for Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review evaluates the research progress and clinical application potential of neural interface technology for peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Due to the limited endogenous regenerative capacity of the peripheral nervous system after injury, the impaired function of the innervated area seriously affects the life quality of patients. Neural interfaces offer a transformative strategy for functional reconstruction by establishing bidirectional communication pathways between the nervous system and external devices. Through a critical analysis of high-impact literature, this article develops a comprehensive review framework encompassing four key dimensions: advancements in material science, technological innovation pathways, clinical translation validation, and existing challenges. Current evidence demonstrates that neural interface materials evolved from traditional rigid substrates to flexible conductive polymers, multifunctional nanocomposites, biodegradable bioactive scaffolds, and environmentally responsive smart materials. Technological breakthroughs include tissue-compliant flexible micro-nano fabrication, wireless self-powered systems, closed-loop neural feedback control, and multimodal precision modulation. Preclinical and clinical researches validated the therapeutic efficacy of neural interfaces in promoting axon regeneration, managing chronic pain, and restoring sensorimotor function. However, persistent challenges (such as limited long-term interfacial stability, post-implantation inflammatory responses, signal quality attenuation, and interindividual therapeutic heterogeneity) hinder widespread clinical adoption. Future research should prioritize interdisciplinary integration to develop: physiologically adaptive material interfaces, intelligent closed-loop modulation systems, personalized treatment strategies with predictive modeling, and mechanistic insights into neuro-electronic interface interactions. These advances will enable neural interface technologies to achieve biosafety, functional durability, and therapeutic precision for revolutionary treatment paradigms.

Indexed as

Biocompatible materialsClinical translationNeural functional reconstructionNeural interfacesNeuromodulation techniquesPeripheral nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID40727303
PMCPMC12296523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.