ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Cosmetic crimes in dromedary camels: a critical overview on these illegal manipulations and its hidden consequences.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a welfare assessment protocol for dromedary camels during road transport.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Assessing animal welfare impacts of cosmetic manipulations in dromedary camels: insights from oxidative and inflammatory biomarkers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- The impact of parasitic diseases on dromedary camel (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review highlights the emerging issue of illegal tampering in dromedary camels, particularly in the context of camel festivals where aesthetic alterations are performed to enhance appearance. These manipulations-often conducted by unqualified individuals-raise serious ethical and animal welfare concerns. Common techniques include mechanical and chemical modifications such as lip stretching, use of local anesthetics to alter facial expression, ear trimming, and injections of substances like silicone, fillers, and botulinum toxin (Botox) to modify head profiles. Hormonal treatments, including testosterone and growth hormone, are administered to induce exaggerated physical traits, often at the cost of fertility and health. Detection of tampering is increasingly challenging due to evolving methods and requires experienced personnel. Visual assessment remains the primary diagnostic step, followed by imaging techniques (e.g., ultrasonography, radiography, thermography) and hormonal assays. Economically, tampering distorts market values by misleading buyers on key animal traits, contributing to significant information asymmetry and undermining pastoral economies. It also introduces serious welfare issues, often carried out without veterinary oversight, resulting in pain, infection risk, and long-term functional impairments. Beyond health and economic implications, tampering undermines cultural integrity, erodes trust in livestock markets, and threatens food security in camel-dependent communities. Addressing this issue requires a multidisciplinary strategy involving scientific research, policy enforcement, community engagement, and education. Standardized inspection prostocols and mandatory certification can strengthen veterinary oversight and deter malpractice. In conclusion, the rise of illegal tampering in dromedary camels presents complex challenges to animal welfare, market integrity, and societal trust. A coordinated and ethically grounded response is essential to safeguard both animal and human livelihoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.